Yeah, I'd be more than willing to publish anyones reviews on the site with proper formatting (as long as it has been proof-read by the site elders first). Really, the people who write the content are the most important people IMO for a site such as this.
I'm not sure which "site elders" you'd have in mind - as a content editor, that's probably something you'd have to do for yourself.
Well, I guess it could be assumed for a select group (Prophet, MMAN, UBerskerker, LH, ect.) that the content doesn't really need to be proof-read as much as for other contributors because of their already growing contributions content wise to the site. I'd be more worried about some news/map review contributes that don't have the same experience from the site.
As a matter of fact, because I might get this rank as site publisher, already a few other members I've spoken to from OldUnreal.com have thought about writing reviews and ect. to support the cause. While this would hopefully only strengthen UnrealSP.org, I'd like to think that a certain quality control could be maintained by people other than me (the publisher) for the site.
I thinking that you (Hellscrag) may underestimate the amount of quality control that is already in place for the site. I think it definitely shows that mostly everything that comes from the main site is of much higher quality than usually offered by a game review site. I'm thinking that Prophet might be the best candidate for proof-reading peoples content after your leave.